Datasets:
The dataset viewer is not available for this dataset.
Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
YAML Metadata Warning:The task_categories "text2text-generation" is not in the official list: text-classification, token-classification, table-question-answering, question-answering, zero-shot-classification, translation, summarization, feature-extraction, text-generation, fill-mask, sentence-similarity, text-to-speech, text-to-audio, automatic-speech-recognition, audio-to-audio, audio-classification, audio-text-to-text, voice-activity-detection, depth-estimation, image-classification, object-detection, image-segmentation, text-to-image, image-to-text, image-to-image, image-to-video, unconditional-image-generation, video-classification, reinforcement-learning, robotics, tabular-classification, tabular-regression, tabular-to-text, table-to-text, multiple-choice, text-ranking, text-retrieval, time-series-forecasting, text-to-video, image-text-to-text, image-text-to-image, image-text-to-video, visual-question-answering, document-question-answering, zero-shot-image-classification, graph-ml, mask-generation, zero-shot-object-detection, text-to-3d, image-to-3d, image-feature-extraction, video-text-to-text, keypoint-detection, visual-document-retrieval, any-to-any, video-to-video, other
mssense Evaluation Benchmark — Closed-Vocabulary Action Trace Generation
Canonical version / DOI: archived on Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21105006 (CC-BY-4.0). This Hugging Face repository is a distribution mirror — please cite the Zenodo DOI.
An evaluation-only benchmark for closed-vocabulary action trace generation in conversational Robotic Process Automation (RPA) authoring. Each sample pairs a conversational request with the oracle labels needed to judge whether a generated action trace is executable against a closed, typed, channel-specific action catalogue — not merely schema-valid.
- Version: 1.1-eval
- Samples: 1865 (1772 seeds + 93 deterministic paraphrastic variants)
- Task families (9): clarification policy, LAT audit, semantic judgment, workflow creation, business-rule extraction, visual grounding / governance, modification intent, audit, interaction regression
- Split: none — the full file is the evaluation suite
- License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY-4.0)
Terminology
A few names in this benchmark are specific to the platform it originates from.
They are kept verbatim because they are used throughout the samples and schema
(for example, in sample_id prefixes and iris_* field names) and changing them
would break reproducibility and the dataset's published identity. The acronyms
are platform-specific; the problems they instantiate are general and
platform-independent.
| Term | Meaning (community-standard concept) |
|---|---|
| action trace | an ordered sequence of typed, executable actions — the durable artefact the system must produce |
| LAT (LeBrain Action Trace) | the platform-specific instance of an action trace used in this benchmark; a list of typed steps. The field lat_candidate holds the candidate trace under analysis |
| mssense | the conversational intent-understanding and workflow-validation component evaluated by this benchmark (the system under test); also the benchmark's name |
| LeBrain | the automation / intelligence platform (Novelis) that connects applications and automates business processes; it defines the closed action catalogue and executes the traces |
| IRIS | LeBrain's Computer Use Agent; the iris_* fields (e.g., iris_control_type) describe executable UI steps targeted at IRIS |
| Intentia | the 2026 research programme of the Novelis R&D laboratory, within which mssense is developed |
| channel | an action category / connector — web, desktop, spreadsheet, email, database, API, file, control-flow |
| oracle | the per-sample ground-truth block (expected_decision, expected_issue_types, required_checks) used for scoring |
Contents
data/mssense_eval_benchmark_v1_1.jsonl the benchmark (one JSON object per line)
schema/evaluation_sample.v1_1.schema.json JSON Schema for a sample
docs/datasheet.md Datasheet for Datasets (Gebru et al., 2018)
docs/dataset_card.md dataset card
docs/evaluation_protocol.md metrics, splits, scoring conventions
docs/related_benchmarks_comparison.md property-by-property comparison of 16 public benchmarks
docs/why_new_benchmark.md one-page gap analysis
docs/statistical_power_analysis.md a priori power analysis per research question
docs/inter_annotator_agreement.md IAA disclosure and v1.2 roadmap
reports/CHANGELOG_v1.0_to_v1.1.md changes from v1.0 to v1.1
LICENSE-DATA CC-BY-4.0
CITATION.cff citation metadata
SHA256SUMS.txt integrity checksums
Verify integrity with sha256sum -c SHA256SUMS.txt (or certutil -hashfile <file> SHA256 on Windows).
Sample format
One JSON object per line. Key fields include sample_id, task_family,
channel_family, input_modality, difficulty, user_intent, input_payload,
lat_candidate, expected_decision, expected_issue_types, business_rules,
and an oracle object with required_checks. See
schema/evaluation_sample.v1_1.schema.json and docs/datasheet.md for the full
specification.
The issue-type vocabulary is the platform's canonical set:
MISSING_VALUE, UNRESOLVED_VARIABLE, AMBIGUOUS_SELECTOR,
MISSING_PRECONDITION, INCONSISTENT_FLOW.
import json
samples = [json.loads(l) for l in open("data/mssense_eval_benchmark_v1_1.jsonl", encoding="utf-8")]
print(len(samples), "samples")
Provenance and license
The released benchmark comprises internally-authored audit, validation, and
generation cases, licensed under CC-BY-4.0. A WONDERBREAD-derived sub-corpus
is prepared in the release tree under a forward-looking attribution clause and is
not included in this v1.1 evaluation file pending adjudication; the clause
takes effect on its first integrated release. Full provenance is documented in
docs/datasheet.md.
Privacy and sanitization. This public release is privacy-sanitized: internal
authoring paths in the input_payload.source_file field were reduced to file
basenames, and incidental personal data that appeared as example form-fill values
in a few interaction scenarios were replaced with synthetic values. These are
metadata and scenario-input fields only; no oracle label (expected_decision,
expected_issue_types, oracle) was modified, so the evaluation is unaffected.
Associated publication
This benchmark supports the manuscript Closed-Vocabulary Action Trace Generation for Conversational RPA Authoring (Yahaya Alassan, Ettifouri, Dahhane; Novelis), submitted to the Journal of Object Technology.
Citation
Dataset DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21105006 (CC-BY-4.0). See
CITATION.cff for machine-readable citation metadata.
- Downloads last month
- 73