Papers
arxiv:2607.11250

Multi-Agent LLMs Fail to Explore Each Other

Published on Jul 13
ยท Submitted by
Hyeong Kyu (Froilan) Choi
on Jul 14
Authors:
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Exploration is essential for reliable autonomy in multi-agent systems, yet it remains unclear whether large language model (LLM) agents can explore effectively when interacting with one another. We show that modern LLM agents fail to do so, often exhibiting myopic and polarized interaction patterns that lead to suboptimal coordination and increased regret. We formalize this challenge as the Multi-Agent Exploration problem, modeling it as a partially observable stochastic game (POSG) problem in which agents must probe peers to infer their capabilities and identify effective interaction strategies. To address this, we introduce Multi- Agent Contextual Exploration (MACE), a lightweight framework that explicitly promotes exploration through structured peer selection. Across both contextual and parametric diversity settings, MACE substantially improves exploration behavior and downstream task performance. We further show theoretically that the value of exploration increases with agent diversity. Overall, our results highlight a fundamental limitation of current LLM agents and underscore the importance of explicitly guided exploration for reliable multi-agent autonomy. Code will be released in https://github.com/deeplearning-wisc/mace

Community

Paper submitter

1๏ธโƒฃ We find that current LLM agents, including frontier models, often fail to systematically explore their peers. Instead, they prematurely commit to a small number of agents, producing myopic and highly polarized interaction patterns.

2๏ธโƒฃ ๐˜ž๐˜ฉ๐˜บ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ? In real-world multi-agent systems, agents may possess different knowledge, capabilities, and areas of expertise. To collaborate effectively, an agent must explore its peers, identify complementary strengths, and learn whom to interact with in different contexts. Without effective exploration, even a system of individually capable agents can suffer from poor coordination and miss valuable information.

3๏ธโƒฃ To address this, we introduce ๐‘ด๐’–๐’๐’•๐’Š-๐‘จ๐’ˆ๐’†๐’๐’• ๐‘ช๐’๐’๐’•๐’†๐’™๐’•๐’–๐’‚๐’ ๐‘ฌ๐’™๐’‘๐’๐’๐’“๐’‚๐’•๐’Š๐’๐’ (๐‘ด๐‘จ๐‘ช๐‘ฌ), a lightweight framework that uses structured, contextual-bandit-based peer selection to help agents discover effective collaborators.

4๏ธโƒฃ Theoretically, MACE achieves sublinear regret, whereas non-exploring strategies incur linear regret. Importantly, the value of exploration grows as the agents become more diverse.

๐ŸŽฏ Our results highlight a fundamental lesson for multi-agent autonomy: building stronger individual agents is not enough. We must also enable them to systematically discover and learn from one another.

This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.

The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API

Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!

If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space

You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend

I've been watching my own multi-agent setups and this matches what I see โ€” agents settle into a pattern fast and never probe whether the other agent has changed behavior. The POSG framing is the right lens, but I'd love to know how much of this is the model architecture vs. the prompt. If you give each agent an explicit "exploration budget" in the system prompt โ€” "try 3 different strategies before converging" โ€” does the regret curve flatten, or is the myopia baked into the transformer's context window?

Sign up or log in to comment

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.11250 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.11250 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.11250 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.