Speaker-Aware Temporal Aggregation Strategies on Segment Representations for Depression Detection in Dyadic Interaction: A Benchmark Study
Abstract
Temporal aggregation methods for speech-based depression detection show inconsistent performance across different backbones and training runs, highlighting the need for robust benchmarking criteria.
Speech-based depression detection compresses features from short audio segments into one speaker-level decision, a step called temporal aggregation rarely studied on its own. Most benchmarks fix a single self-supervised encoder and a single hand-picked layer, so a reported gain may reflect the pipeline rather than the aggregation method itself. We introduce DEPOOL, a controlled benchmark that compares six aggregation architectures with six frozen speech backbones on an English and a Mandarin depression corpus, where each configuration learns which backbone layers matter rather than fixing one by hand. Across the resulting 72-configuration grid, a third of configurations collapse into predicting a single class for every speaker, a failure tied to the backbone as much as to the method, and the architecture that is most stable in a single-seed run becomes unreliable when training repeats across seeds. Robustness to backbone and seed, rather than average accuracy across a single pipeline, should be a first-class benchmarking criterion for temporal aggregation in clinical speech.
Community
Depression detection from speech usually squashes many short audio clips into one decision per speaker (temporal aggregation), but this step almost never gets studied on its own since most benchmarks lock in one encoder and one layer. That makes it hard to know if reported gains are from the aggregation method or just the pipeline setup. We built DEPOOL to test this properly: 6 aggregation methods x 6 frozen speech backbones on English + Mandarin depression datasets, where each setup learns which layers actually matter instead of hand-picking one. Result: across all 72 configs, a third just collapse and predict one class for everyone (backbone-dependent, not just method-dependent), and the architecture that looks most stable in a single run often falls apart across different seeds. Bottom line: robustness across backbones and seeds matters way more than average accuracy on one fixed pipeline when benchmarking aggregation for clinical speech.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Layer-wise Cross-Lingual Depression Detection from Speech: Analysis with Contrastive Alignment (2026)
- Can Conversational Temporal Dynamics Improve Depression Detection in Dyads? A Preliminary Investigation in Multi-Modality Perspectives (2026)
- Probing-Guided Layer Selection from Self-Supervised Speech Models for Generalizable Audio Deepfake Detection (2026)
- S-JEPA : Soft Clustering Anchors for Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning (2026)
- Context-aware child-directed speech detection from long-form recordings (2026)
- Synergizing Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Alzheimer Detection with Language-Invariant Multimodal Bi-Geometric Adversarial Learning (2026)
- Echo: A Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture for Speaker Diarization and Speech Recognition in a Shared Latent Space (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2607.02904 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper